5 minutes read time
For a generation of American students raised on active shooter drills, the sequence of events is horrifyingly familiar: a campus-wide alert flashes across their phones, warning of a gunman. Doors are barricaded, lights are turned off, and frantic, whispered calls are made to loved ones. “As of right now, I’m safe. I love you,” one University of Arkansas student told her grandmother as she hid behind a green screen in a broadcast studio. The terror is real. The adrenaline is real. The only thing that isn’t real is the shooter. In the past week, a coordinated and cruel wave of “swatting” calls—hoax reports of active shooters—has targeted at least 11 college campuses across the nation, from Pennsylvania to Arizona. This is not a series of harmless pranks; it is a dangerous and escalating epidemic, a form of domestic terrorism that weaponizes our collective trauma of mass shootings to sow chaos, drain resources, and put innocent lives at risk.
The Anatomy of a Swatting Attack
The recent wave of attacks, which included six universities on the first day of classes alone, has been sophisticated and chillingly effective. The perpetrators, often using temporary cellphone numbers and voice-cloaking apps to mask their identities, have called in detailed threats, frequently claiming a gunman is armed with an AR-15 style rifle. In at least four of the recent campus incidents, the callers have even included the sound of gunfire in the background to add a terrifying layer of authenticity. The goal, as experts note, is to trigger the most massive law enforcement response possible. As my own son experienced at the University of Tennessee, Chattanooga—the first campus hit in this wave—the result is an immediate lockdown, a swarm of heavily armed officers, and a campus community plunged into hours of fear and uncertainty.
The Dual Dangers: A Tragic Response or a Complacent One
The dangers created by this malicious trend are twofold. The most immediate and terrifying risk is a tragic, fatal outcome. When police respond to what they believe is an active mass shooting, they do so with overwhelming force. This creates a volatile situation where a misunderstanding or a sudden movement can have deadly consequences. In 2017, a police officer in Wichita, Kansas, shot and killed an innocent man, Andrew Finch, while responding to a swatting call made by a gamer. The FBI has warned that these hoaxes put “innocent people at risk,” a fact underscored by a 2023 incident at Harvard where four Black students were held at gunpoint by police responding to a false report.
The second, more insidious danger is the long-term erosion of vigilance. In a country where active shooter alerts and lockdown drills are a grimly routine part of academic life, the repeated cry of “wolf” risks creating a dangerous sense of complacency. “It does make me worry that people will be inclined to think it’s a false alarm,” said Mya Norman, a chemistry instructor at the University of Arkansas who hid under her desk during the recent hoax. “We live in tornado alley, where people hear a tornado warning and go outside to look. So it does concern me that we could end up with that kind of an effect.” This is the cruel genius of the swatter’s strategy: to exploit our deepest fears in a way that could make us less safe when a real threat finally emerges.
A National Epidemic and a Drain on Resources
This is not a new or isolated phenomenon. The FBI has been tracking swatting since at least 2008, a trend that began with hoaxes targeting celebrities and has since evolved to include politicians, synagogues, and, with increasing frequency, schools. The numbers are staggering. From January 2023 to June 2024 alone, there were more than 800 recorded swatting incidents at K-12 schools in the United States.

The cost of this chaos is immense. Each call triggers a massive, multi-agency response that drains millions of dollars in public resources. A single call to Northern Arizona University prompted a response from local police, county sheriff’s deputies, and both state and federal agents. One data scientist estimated that in 2023, the cost of police responses to false threats at K-12 schools nationwide was a staggering $82.3 million. “Every hoax call like this diverts officers from real emergencies and real risks,” a former police chief explained, “and that’s the real tragedy of it.”
A Call for Accountability
The wave of swatting calls terrorizing college campuses is a stark and painful reflection of a society grappling with the real-world trauma of gun violence. The perpetrators are not pranksters; they are terrorists who have found a way to inflict maximum psychological damage with minimal effort. While law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, are working to track down those responsible, experts agree that stronger laws and harsher penalties are needed to confront this evolving epidemic. In an era where the fear of a campus shooting is an ever-present reality for students, the act of deliberately and maliciously faking one is an act of profound cruelty that must be treated with the seriousness it deserves.
Discover more from Clight Morning Analysis
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.